Background. Reliable high-throughput serological assays SERO for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies SERO (Abs) are urgently needed for the effective containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it is of crucial importance to understand the strength and duration of immunity after infection MESHD, and to make informed decisions concerning the activation or discontinuation of physical distancing restrictions. Methods. In 184 serum samples SERO from 130 COVID-19 patients and 54 SARS-CoV-2 negative subjects, the analytical and clinical performances SERO of four commercially available chemiluminescent assays (Abbott SARS-Cov-2 IgG, Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2, Ortho SARS-CoV-2 total and IgG) and one enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay SERO (Diesse ENZY-WELL SARS-CoV-2 IgG) were evaluated and compared with the neutralization activity achieved using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Findings. Precision results ranged from 0.9% to 11.8% for all assays. Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated linearity of results at concentrations within the cut-off value. Overall, sensitivity SERO ranged from 78.5 to 87.8%, and specificity, from 97.6 to 100%. On limiting the analysis to samples collected 12 days after onset of symptoms TRANS, the sensitivity SERO of all assays increased, the highest value (95.2%) being obtained with VITRO Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total and Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The strongest PRNT50 correlation with antibody SERO levels was obtained with ENZY-Well SARS-CoV-2 IgG (rho = 0.541, p < 0.001). Interpretation. The results confirmed that all immunoassays SERO had an excellent specificity, whereas sensitivity SERO varied across immunoassays SERO, depending strongly on the time interval between symptoms onset TRANS and sample collection. Further studies should be conducted to achieve a stronger correlation between antibody SERO measurement and PRNT50 in order to obtain useful information for providing effective passive antibody SERO therapy, and developing a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.